This question is often asked. Unfortunately, I can give an unequivocal answer on it: Intel processors are better suited for 1C for a large number of users, but for a small amount AMD can be quite suitable. Do not want to go into details? Focus on blue. If you wish to understand why so, then read further, I will try to warm up why Intel is better than AMD for 1C server.

The review will be carried out within the framework of modern linewheat, at the moment. A consumer segment and professional will be considered, because, reserve coffee, proceed to reading. Do not worry, in fact, here the text is just a couple of sips.

Did you ask the question "AMD or Intel is better for the 1C server?". This question implies another number of others:

Let's start with the answer to the first question. Despite the fact that the developers promise to be about to improve the support of multithreading, to implement the possibilities of multi-core systems, at the same time, to sfarring a more competent distribution of resources, in fact we get the same product, but the packaging is more pleasant. More than 4 cores are not required, but high requirements for clock frequency. More precisely, even not so, high requirements for the speed of the processor. Accordingly, we will consider small solidal solutions with a high clock frequency.

The second question is the most important. Budget is a key element when choosing configurations. I can't know your budget, but I will point out approximate prices on the CPU. Better recheck, because the market is quite dynamic, the cost will constantly change, for heavily depends on the dollar.

Third question. Also important. If the components are difficult to find, then travel can make a lot of money, and the saddest time. In general, you will have to decide, ready to sweat or better wait.

Unprofessional segment

Here we consider solutions for the user segment. In general, the components of the user segment can be suitable for solving tasks even for 50 users. But, it is better not to form assemblies more than 20. In addition, consumer correction products are less reliable than professional and has fewer useful functions than we would like. For example, there is no support for ECC memory. But, the use of consumer CPU has the right to life.

So, let's start with the AMD line.

AMD Ryzen 5. From 4 cores up to 6, from 8 streams up to 12, the base clock frequency from 3.1 GHz to 3.6, the maximum from 3.4 to 4.2. More interested in basic. TDP - from 65 W to 95 watts. Normal indicators. Quite good features. At least looks worthy.

We are interested in 4-6 nuclear versions. There are no meaning with a high nuclei. So, if you consider the entire line, then for 5 users enough 1400, it is better to take 1500x for 10, for 15 it is worth viewing at 1600x, for 20 - 2600x. Everything is quite simple. Detailed features can be found on the manufacturer's website.

Intel ruler. The AMD Ryzen 3 line did not take at all. Ryzen 5 Rather Core i3 competitor. Let's start. Core i3 - base frequency from 3.0 GHz to 4.0 GHz. Range wider. Noticeably below the latency of working with fast memory. Core i5 is better in business. Now compare processors.

Antibony

For configurations on multiple users, no more than 5. Ryzen 5 1400 (4 Cores, 8 Threads, 3.2GHz). I3-8100 (4 Cores, 4 Threads, 3.6Ghz). So, judging by the benchmarks in mixed loads AMD manifests itself a little better, but in consecutive queries and work with memory slightly behind. The price of percent is about 8500, the average price of a blue 8100 is about 12,000. Accessories among themselves in high costs will slightly differ. Mother's and other buy no problem. In general, in this category AMD won. The speed is the same, but the price is below 1400. I3-8300 in turn gives the product from red, but the average cost is already 13,000 rubles.

And if users 10? Well, we take either Core i5-8400 (6 Cores, 6 Threads, 2.8Ghz) or Ryzen 5 1500x (4 Cores, 8 Threads 3.5GHz). Despite the lower frequency, the Intel benchmark shows better performance. But! The price of Intel is already about 18,000 rubles, the AMD will leave smaller, about 11,000 wooden. The difference is essential. At the same time, the remaining components, such as motherboards and other things, will have an equal cost regardless of the processor. AMD again looks nicer.

A similar situation with 15 users. We use Intel Core i5-8500 (6 Cores, 6 Threads, 3.00 GHz) in opponents set Ryzen 5 1600x (6 Cores, 12 Threads, 3.6GHz). So, by speed approximately the same. But, the price of the Intel about 20,000 Endreamed, the AMD will rise in the amount of about 13,000. The accompanying components will devour finances by approximately on a par.

Further by analogy. The consumer segment keeps approximately on a par. But AMD with the same speed will cost cheaper than production Intel. Of course, you can sing a song about TDP, reliability, architecture. But the fact will remain a fact. Now, if it were required for games, the winner was most likely different.

Professional segment

It's more complicated here. Unfortunately, AMD Opteron was failed, lost in all XEON parameters. Although the CPU was not the bad. AMD EPYC is mostly many nuclei, but a very low clock frequency, so that Intel Xeon for 1C in the server segment unambiguously won.

It would be interesting to compare them from the point of view of virtualization. There AMD EPYC could show perfectly well, but for 1C conclusion is obvious.

Architecture. First, the more the amount of users, the higher the probability of memory errors. So you need RAM with ECC. Secondly, server processors have other controllers, tires. They, in general, somewhat more productive are capable of working in a pair, which is not available in the user segment. So, in the server segment to a large number of users, the winner is Intel Xeon.

Intel or AMD is better for 1C server? The winners were not found. It turns out that the question is not particularly correct. Depends on the situation. Look at the budget, the number of users and the benchmark on the projection in the workstations. Then get a more comprehensive answer. I hope that even this information was enough. Good, good, success!

Source:

#Intel #amd # server # 1c # processor # server guide